Continental Ultra Contact 6 ( UC6 ) : B Continental Max Contact 6 ( MC6 ) : A
With both UC6 & MC6 boasting their short wet braking distances in their market material, which one is better ? MC6 is one class degree above UC6 being the better wet braking tire compared with UC6 .
Continental Ultra Contact 6 ( UC6 ) : C Continental Max Contact 6 ( MC6 ) : D In regards to rolling resistance, UC6 is has the upper bridge player here being 1 course higher compare to MC6 with a tag “ C ” rat. hence when it comes to fuel saving UC6 has more potential compared to MC6 .
UTQG wear rating
Continental Ultra Contact 6 ( UC6 ) : 340
Read more: 5 ทรงผมสั้นสุดฮิตสำหรับคนหน้าเล็กปี 2020
Continental Max Contact 6 ( MC6 ) : 340 Both of them have the lapp UTQG wear rating. Hence it I would expect the UC6 & MC6 to be slightly similar in terms of their wear performances .
215/50R17 Continental Ultra Contact 6 ( UC6 ) : RM 435 215/50R17 Continental Max Contact 6 ( MC6 ) : RM 445 MC6 is priced RM10 more compare to UC6 when comparing the tire size 215/50 R17. This is somehow justifiable by its commodity wet braking performances and besides current premium touring tireline condition. For the latest bore price comparison, be certain to check out price board or app.
Is Continental UC6 quiet?
Based on the revue from tyrereviews.com UC6 matches the lapp noise level as the Michelin ’ s and most of them think it is a silence tire .
overall, both tires are very good in wet brake while the MC6 is a class better than UC6. Things were slenderly flipped when it comes to rolling immunity as UC6 is one classify flush better than MC6. While MC6 has a higher UTQG wear rat, it is a more expensive compare to UC6. In a nut shell, if you can spare a copulate more bucks and moisture brake is identical authoritative to you than MC6 is your run down choice. If not UC6 ’ randomness performance is not besides moth-eaten either. 🙂